Unlimited Game Rentals Delivered - Free Trial

Go Back   N-Philes :: Forums > The Chatterbox > Current Events & Politics
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2006, 01:00 PM #1
Batist
Treasure Hunter
 
Batist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sainte Maxime
Posts: 34,890 Batist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be coolBatist spends too much time pretending to be cool
Send a message via AIM to Batist Send a message via MSN to Batist
Is the United States truly a democracy?

i'm starting to wonder...
Quote:
Activists Seek to Evict Souter From Home

By KATHY McCORMACK, Associated Press Writer Sat Jan 21, 7:54 AM ET

CONCORD, N.H. - Angered by a
U.S. Supreme Court ruling that sided with a Connecticut city that wanted to seize homes for economic development, a group of activists is trying to get one of the justices who voted for the decision evicted from his own home.
ADVERTISEMENT
click here

The group, led by a California man, wants Justice
David Souter's home seized for the purpose of building an inn called "Lost Liberty Hotel."

They submitted enough petition signatures — only 25 were needed — to bring the matter before voters in March. This weekend, they're descending on Souter's hometown, the central New Hampshire town of Weare, population 8,500, to rally for support.

"This is in the tradition of the Boston Tea Party and the Pine Tree Riot," organizer Logan Darrow Clements said, referring to the riot that took place during the winter of 1771-1772, when colonists in Weare beat up officials appointed by King George III who fined them for logging white pines without approval.

"All we're trying to do is put an end to eminent domain abuse," Clements said, by having those who advocate or facilitate it "live under it, so they understand why it needs to end."

Bill Quigley, Weare deputy police chief, said if protesters show up, they're going to be told to stay across the street from a dirt road that leads to Souter's brown farmhouse, which is more than 200 years old. It isn't known if Souter will be home.

"They're obviously not going to be allowed on Justice Souter's property," he said. "There's no reason for anybody to go down that road unless they live on that road, and we know the residents that live there. The last time (Clements) showed up, they had a total of about three or four people who showed up to listen to him."

Clements, of Los Angeles, said he's never tried to contact Souter.

"The justice doesn't have any comment about it," Kathy Arberg, a Supreme Court spokeswoman, said about the protesters' cause.

The petition asks whether the town should take Souter's land for development as an inn; whether to set up a trust fund to accept donations for legal expenses; and whether to set up a second trust fund to accept donations to compensate Souter for taking his land.

The matter goes to voters on March 14.

Clements said participants planned to meet at Weare Town Hall on Saturday morning and divide into teams to go door-to-door to get more petition signatures. He also wants to distribute copies of the Supreme Court's decision, Kelo vs. City of New London, to residents.

The court said New London, Conn., could seize homeowners' property to develop a hotel, convention center, office space and condominiums next to Pfizer Inc.'s new research headquarters.

The city argued that tax revenues and new jobs from the development would benefit the public. The Pfizer complex was built, but seven homeowners challenged the rest of the development in court. The Supreme Court's ruling against them prompted many states, including New Hampshire, to examine their eminent domain laws.

State Rep. Neal Kurk, a Weare resident who is sponsoring two pieces of eminent domain legislation in New Hampshire, said he expects the group's proposal to be defeated overwhelmingly.

"Most people here see this as an act of revenge and an improper attack on the judicial system," Kurk said. "You don't go after a judge personally because you disagree with his judgments."
__________________
Batist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 01:04 PM #2
bleeper2.0
Livid
 
bleeper2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 6,339 bleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe insertsbleeper2.0 will one day invent something useful made from recycled shoe inserts
Quote:
"Most people here see this as an act of revenge and an improper attack on the judicial system," Kurk said. "You don't go after a judge personally because you disagree with his judgments."

However you would expect a judge to agree with his judgements and expect them to be carried out as far as the law says it should.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by caster13
If that makes me a douche, than call me the king and master of all douchery. Actually, just call me "Your Highness".
bleeper2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2006, 01:04 PM #3
General_Shiggy
live, and love
 
General_Shiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 2,751 General_Shiggy is starting to annoy peopleGeneral_Shiggy is starting to annoy people
Nope, we have Republic based government
General_Shiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.